patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Co Location

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Freight Rail Reroute on the Agenda This Week

Two Southwest LRT committees will discuss technical issues surrounding the controversial proposal.

The Southwest Light Rail Transit project’s freight rail reroute and co-location alternatives will be discussed at two meetings this week. The Southwest LRT Business Advisory Committee will take up the issue at a Wednesday morning that begins at 8 a.m. Technical issues having to do with the freight rail reroute and co-location options are expected to begin at 9:05 a.m. The Southwest LRT Community Advisory Committee will discuss the issue at a Thursday meeting that begin at 6 p.m. Discussion of the freight rail issues is scheduled to begin at 7:35 p.m. Both meetings are in Suite 500 of the Park Place West Building (6465 Wayzata Blvd., St. Louis Park). Freight rail routing has been particularly contentious part of the Southwest LRT project—…

Kathryn Kottke

9:31 am on Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Nearby residents are not the only ones who are concerned about the safety hazards associated with rerouting significant freight from a mainline freight corridor to a lightly used spur line. TC & W's comments are published in the SWLRT DEIS (Draft Environmental Impact Statement), and they are more adamantly against the reroute than residents have been. In fact, according to their statements, …   more ›

Monday, November 26, 2012

Southwest LRT Typo Underestimates Co-location Costs by $100M

The error, which arose out of editing and formatting changes, does not change the conclusions of the project’s draft environmental impact statement.

Engineering consultants have identified a $100 million typo in a Southwest Light Rail Transit report that understates the cost of putting the Twin Cities & Western freight line in the same corridor as the light rail—an option known as “co-location.” The draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) listed the “professional services” cost of option 3A-1—the co-location alternative—as “$99,357 (in thousands).” That should have read “$199,357 (in thousands).” The difference between the two figures is $100 million but does not alter the conclusions of the DEIS. “While I'm dismayed that an error of this nature was made, we all think it's important to be transparent, to identify the error and make the correction immediately,” Hennepin County …

fgvkl

4:03 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

http://www.coachoutletonlinegg.com/ Coach Outlet Online http://www.coachoutletonlineaol.net/ Coach Outlet Online http://www.coachfactoryoutletwy.com/ Coach Factory Outlet http://www.coachoutletstorefc.com/ Coach Outlet Store http://www.coachoutletaol.org/ Coach Outlet http://www.coachfactoryonlineest.net/ Coach Factory Online http://www.coachfactoryoutletpst.com/ Coach Factory Outlet http://www.…   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?