Politics & Government

F-Bombs OK? FCC Asks If It Should Ease Swearing, Nudity Ban

It 'would not serve the public interest,' one Golden Valley resident argued.

Should the Federal Communications Commission lighten up on enforcing its ban on swear words and nudity on broadcast media?

The agency has proposed doing just that—letting "fleeting" violations slide and enforcing its rules only for "eggregious" offenses.

The FCC invited comments for 60 days on the enforcement change in an April 1, 2013 announcement (click on PDF thumnail).

Find out what's happening in St. Louis Parkwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Janet Oliver of St. Louis Park submitted this comment April 9:

Why would you want to add to the coursening and degrading of TV by letting our children be exposedto profanity and frontal nudity? Cable is already out, as are most movies and now network TV willhave to be off limits in caring America homes. Shame on you for considering this.

Find out what's happening in St. Louis Parkwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Comments submitted to the FCC are public. You can see them by searching a comment database at the FCC website.

The Minnesota Family Council sent an email April 9 (click on PDF thumbnail) asking people to submit comments such as: "I oppose any changes to the current FCC indecency standards that would allow television and radio stations to broadcast expletives and nudity on the public airwaves, even if brief or 'fleeting.'”

Would you like the FCC to ease its enforcement of indecency rules on TV and radio broadcasters? Leave a comment below.

Click on the YouTube thumbnail (or visit YouTube.com) for an example of the "fleeting expletives" behind the U.S. Supreme Court case cited by the FCC. It's Cher at the 2002 Billboard Music Awards (6:00 mark—profanity warning).


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

More from St. Louis Park